BREAKING THE MYTH OF MALE INVULNERABILITY: DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CASES IN BAUCHI STATE

BREAKING THE MYTH OF MALE INVULNERABILITY: DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CASES IN BAUCHI STATE

1.1 Background of the Study

The pervasive belief that “real men” cannot be victims of domestic violence perpetuates silence and invisibility. In Bauchi State—where traditional notions of masculinity emphasize strength and emotional restraint—men who experience partner violence are often dismissed as fabricating or provoking such incidents (Myhill, 2017). This myth of male invulnerability not only invalidates genuine victim experiences but also hinders data collection, service provision, and social support.

Recent qualitative reports from Bauchi reveal cases of physical assault, sexual coercion, and psychological abuse against men that go unacknowledged by family, community, and authorities ( Walker-Descartes et al., 2021). Debunking this myth requires empirical evidence on incidence, types of abuse, and the lived experiences of male survivors, paving the way for more inclusive policies and societal perceptions.

 

1.2 Statement of the Problem

Despite emerging cases, there is no systematic documentation in Bauchi State of domestic violence against men or analysis of the cultural myths that uphold male invulnerability. This void perpetuates service gaps and reinforces the idea that domestic violence is solely a women’s issue.

 

1.3 Objectives of the Study

To document the prevalence and forms of domestic violence experienced by men in Bauchi State.

To analyze the cultural narratives that sustain the myth of male invulnerability.

To recommend multi‐level strategies—policy, community engagement, media—to challenge myths and support male survivors.

 

1.4 Research Questions

What proportion of men in Bauchi State report experiencing domestic violence, and in what forms?

Which cultural narratives and gender norms contribute to the disbelief of male victims?

What interventions—legal, educational, media—can effectively dispel myths and enhance support for abused men?

 

1.5 Significance of the Study

Policy Makers & Legal Reformers: Data to advocate for gender‐inclusive domestic‐violence laws and enforcement.

Community and Religious Leaders: Insights to lead community dialogues that redefine masculinity and empathy.

Media and Educators: Evidence to create campaigns and curricula that normalize acknowledgment of male victimhood.

 

1.6 Scope and Limitation of the Study

Scope: Mixed‐methods study in urban (Gombe–Jos corridor) and rural Bauchi LGAs, surveying 300 men and conducting 6 focus‐group discussions.

Limitations:

Social Desirability: Men may underreport experiences due to fear of social stigma.

Cultural Diversity: Findings may not reflect nuances across different ethnic groups within the state.

 

1.7 Definition of Terms

Myth of Male Invulnerability: Cultural belief that men cannot be victims of domestic violence due to inherent strength.

Gender Norms: Societal rules prescribing appropriate behaviors for men and women.

Domestic Violence: Physical, sexual, or psychological harm inflicted by an intimate partner.

Multi‐Level Strategies: Integrated interventions operating at policy, community, and media levels.

Focus‐Group Discussion: A qualitative method gathering perceptions from a small group on a specific topic.